Legal and privacy

No categories

What Louis Vuitton v. Molly Tea means for well-known marks

August 18, 2026

Decorative design or brand identifier?: Chrome Hearts v. Nordstrom

July 21, 2026

Is kindness the key to building brand loyalty?

May 19, 2026

Luxury brands are now limited in naming capacity

April 21, 2026

What the Supreme Court’s tariff ruling means for luxury imports

March 17, 2026

Your watch collection is probably worth more than you think — and your estate plan doesn’t know it exists

February 20, 2026

Amazon’s $475M luxury play and Saks Global’s survival plan collide

February 17, 2026

The rising risk of ‘superfakes’ and strategies to protect luxury brands

February 3, 2026

The hidden cost of retail bankruptcy for luxury consumers and brands

January 13, 2026

What’s at the end of the catwalk? Overtime pay, lunch breaks and other worker protections

December 16, 2025

Bob Mackie, from glamour to JCPenney: Who owns name, image and likeness?

November 13, 2025

Authentics versus superfakes: Who will prevail?

September 30, 2025

Tariffs and their effect on luxury goods: Even the ‘de minimis‘ exemption is no more

August 19, 2025

Lessons from public trials: When is recording permitted?

July 8, 2025

How luxury brands are deploying agentic AI to enhance customer experiences

June 19, 2025

The new administration eased independent contractor rules. Can luxury brands cheer?

May 19, 2025

ICE raids and I-9 audits: What should luxury brands do?

April 14, 2025

AI and luxury fashion: Useful tool or oxymoron?

March 10, 2025

Trump tariffs and troubleshooting trading in timeless treasures

February 6, 2025

Lions, tigers, bears and ‘Wirkins,’ oh my!: The legality of Walmart’s Hermès Birkin dupe

January 7, 2025

New York borrows yet another California policy affecting luxury brands

December 10, 2024